Sception Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Vasshpit said: Annnd they go with centaurs... 😒 eh, maybe it will be beastly stuff in general. Centaurs, minotaurs, satyrs, etc. Like beastmen back, only reimagined asa destruction faction - like I would have done with them in the first place. Edited June 14 by Sception 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejecutor Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 7 minutes ago, Dragon-knight77 said: Here your option now pick one What's the third one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarakUrbaz Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 5 minutes ago, Sception said: eh, maybe it will be beastly stuff in general. Centaurs, minotaurs, satyrs, etc. Like beastmen back, only reimagined asa destruction faction - like I would have done with them in the first place. Honestly removing the Chaos part of Beasts of Chaos would just serve to ****** off Beasts of Chaos players even more than they already have. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HorticulusTGA Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Ejecutor said: What's the third one? The Godbeast Fangathrak (from the Realmgate Wars), the leaving ghurish arcway (mega Realmgate) to the Eightpoints currently entrapped by Gordrakk. Edited June 14 by HorticulusTGA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejecutor Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 minute ago, HorticulusTGA said: The Godbeast Fangathrak (from the Realmgate Wars), the leaving ghurish arcway (mega Realmgate) to the Eightpoints currently entrapped by Gordrakk. The one that is like a massive worm, right? I don't see that kind of stuff getting an army. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vasshpit Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 8 minutes ago, HorticulusTGA said: entrapped by Gordrakk. Where can I read about this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarakUrbaz Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 3 minutes ago, Vasshpit said: Where can I read about this? Orruk Warclans Battletome 3E goes into it. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neverchosen Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Maybe I am being silly but I feel like the Drogrukh reveal is just going to provide an alternative option to running Kragnos as a God. Like a generic unnamed version of the character. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vasshpit Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 3 minutes ago, BarakUrbaz said: Orruk Warclans Battletome 3E goes into it. Ah. Thanks. Never picked it up. Just read everything I needed online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AquaRegis Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 57 minutes ago, Dragon-knight77 said: Here your option now pick one Silent people are never happening. They were just fluff filler to add some lore depth. Kragnos is done. He's just going to be a model that sticks out like a sore thumb in destruction, and that's it. I don't know what that worm thing is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arzalyn Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 So Honest wargammer just dropped a video with pics from the book about list building. In the comments he confirmed allies are gone and Regiments of Renown are the only "ally" like system that remained. Also mount traits seem to still be a thing. 7 3 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arzalyn Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Two more important parts, if you have 50 o less points than the battle limit you get a extra cp on the first round and having more auxiliary units give the opponent a extra cp each battle round. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarakUrbaz Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 3 minutes ago, Arzalyn said: Two more important parts, if you have 50 o less points than the battle limit you get a extra cp on the first round and having more auxiliary units give the opponent a extra cp each battle round. I suppose the heroes with compulsory regiment options refers to things like Underworlds warbands, Callis and Toll, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AquaRegis Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 AOS doesn't need any more factions tbh. It needs to focus on expanding on some of the neglected factions like Fyreslayer, Idoneth, Ossiarch, daughters etc, before making a brand new army. This does seem to be the direction they are going in though. Cities, Ironjawz and Darkoath being recent examples of expansions/updates. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arzalyn Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 6 minutes ago, BarakUrbaz said: I suppose the heroes with compulsory regiment options refers to things like Underworlds warbands, Callis and Toll, etc. That is my supposition as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejecutor Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 39 minutes ago, AquaRegis said: AOS doesn't need any more factions tbh. It needs to focus on expanding on some of the neglected factions like Fyreslayer, Idoneth, Ossiarch, daughters etc, before making a brand new army. This does seem to be the direction they are going in though. Cities, Ironjawz and Darkoath being recent examples of expansions/updates. While I agree that it would be awesome if all the factions receive love, the reality is that those that are not selling well will receive the bare minimum and GW will try again with new stuff. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captaniser Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Kinda wild to have your main headliner character for an entire edition be imprisoned offscreen and we're supposed to find out about it in a lore rundown article. Kragnos must have suffered a very sudden course correction in the early stages of aos 3.0, and I believe it is in part due to the community backlash of him not really fitting in aesthetically with any other destruction faction, and just due to the fact that GW are quite bad at portraying the destruction factions with any real depth and agency. The way that they more or less confirm that the Drogrukh are still out there somewhere and Kragnos has been put on an icey cliffhanger, I foresee that he will return in about 5 years with a Drogrukh faction that he will fit into seemlessly. 12 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejecutor Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 12 minutes ago, Captaniser said: Kinda wild to have your main headliner character for an entire edition be imprisoned offscreen and we're supposed to find out about it in a lore rundown article. Kragnos must have suffered a very sudden course correction in the early stages of aos 3.0, and I believe it is in part due to the community backlash of him not really fitting in aesthetically with any other destruction faction, and just due to the fact that GW are quite bad at portraying the destruction factions with any real depth and agency. The way that they more or less confirm that the Drogrukh are still out there somewhere and Kragnos has been put on an icey cliffhanger, I foresee that he will return in about 5 years with a Drogrukh faction that he will fit into seemlessly. Chorfs in around two years. Kragnos and the Gang in around 5 years. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gareth 🍄 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 hour ago, Arzalyn said: In the comments he confirmed allies are gone and Regiments of Renown are the only "ally" like system that remained. Also mount traits seem to still be a thing. Was thinking they might be heading that way with the lack of allies info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScionOfOssia Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 26 minutes ago, Captaniser said: Kinda wild to have your main headliner character for an entire edition be imprisoned offscreen and we're supposed to find out about it in a lore rundown article. Honestly, I don’t think most people particularly care- Almost entirely because even GW probably had no idea what the guy’s deal was supposed to be. He has like 3 different, wildly varying depictions across 3 books, and, as I’ve said before, he’s not like Nagash where there’s loads of stuff you can have him doing, Kragnos lacks the personality to carry a narrative. It’s pretty telling that the entire era was about everyone else and Kragnos felt like an afterthought most of the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HCMistborn Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 They should have just held onto him and released him with his own army. Now even if they release a really cool army for him there is a sour taste in a lot of peoples mouth for him and any beast man faction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sahrial Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 3 minutes ago, HCMistborn said: They should have just held onto him and released him with his own army. Now even if they release a really cool army for him there is a sour taste in a lot of peoples mouth for him and any beast man faction. Yknow I remember well the rumors he was supposed to be a BoC model that got switched to Destruction last minute for “unknown reasons”. I really wouldn’t surprised if the reasons for that happened to be 3e post production rolling into conflict with ToW pre-production and they realized they’d be dropping BoC from AoS by the following edition and needed to pivot what to do with the new kit they’d just ordered a hundred thousand of from manufacturing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingBrodd Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 50 minutes ago, Captaniser said: GW are quite bad at portraying the destruction factions with any real depth and agency. This. Im really hoping that Ogors get a strong narrative focus. Kruelboyz were the starter box antagonists and quickly slipped to the wayside. Sons of Behemat stomped onto the scene to be immediately sidelined by Lumineth. Destruction is NARRATIVELY the most neglected Alliance and Factions. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejecutor Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 9 minutes ago, Sahrial said: Yknow I remember well the rumors he was supposed to be a BoC model that got switched to Destruction last minute for “unknown reasons”. I really wouldn’t surprised if the reasons for that happened to be 3e post production rolling into conflict with ToW pre-production and they realized they’d be dropping BoC from AoS by the following edition and needed to pivot what to do with the new kit they’d just ordered a hundred thousand of from manufacturing. Those rumours were discarded by sources that don't get their income from the views. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
novakai Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 23 minutes ago, Sahrial said: Yknow I remember well the rumors he was supposed to be a BoC model that got switched to Destruction last minute for “unknown reasons”. I really wouldn’t surprised if the reasons for that happened to be 3e post production rolling into conflict with ToW pre-production and they realized they’d be dropping BoC from AoS by the following edition and needed to pivot what to do with the new kit they’d just ordered a hundred thousand of from manufacturing. No it was confirm firmly that he was always design for destruction cough a certain popular YouTube creator imply to have interview the miniature designer who design Kragnos and through back door conversation confirm that he was instructed to make a Destruction centaur god for Age of Sigmar cough 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.