Jump to content

The Rumour Thread


Recommended Posts

I feel like the way people are talking about Chaos Warriors, is not really considering that they are not simply armoured Darkoath but highly trained and disciplined expressions of the military might of Archaon's unending warmachine. Keep in mind that a large number of Chaos Warriors have dedicated themselves in part or fully to Khorne. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Neverchosen said:

I feel like the way people are talking about Chaos Warriors, is not really considering that they are not simply armoured Darkoath but highly trained and disciplined expressions of the military might of Archaon's unending warmachine. Keep in mind that a large number of Chaos Warriors have dedicated themselves in part or fully to Khorne. 

 

The problem is a chaos warrior dedicated to khorne is better at fighting than a blood warrior who's entirely dedicated to khorne. Points aside that doesn't make sense.

 

It's fine. Maybe Beasts of Chaos aligned to Khorne make better proxies for StD anyway. I liked running them Blades of Khorne for flavor but with only one faction rule the flavor is somewhat lacking anyway.

Edited by The Red King
  • Thanks 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MitGas said:

Yeah, this feels hella wrong. If they wanna depict Khornates as raging who can‘t fight well, then they need to up their dmg or something in return. Khorne Lords have always been tremendous fighters, so the basic warriors that follow this path should be capable - at least on the level of vanilla CWs - as well. 
 

And the Curseling too. That‘s the one proper human fighter we have in DoT and he‘s on 4+/4+

Yeah, ignoring Slaanesh. This is one of my only complaints for Chaos.

It not because you are berserking that you will miss more, maybe untrained mortals, but Blood Warriors are not mere mortals at all.

It should have been a 3+/3+ while keeping the 3 attacks. They should be better in close combat than Chaos Warriors. The 2 mortal wounds on a 5+ when killed is nice, but I would have prefered a more formidable combat profile when alive.

Same for the Curselings, they are described as formidable warriors and are hero class, so it is indeed a bit strange they are stuck with a 4+/4+.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Red King said:

The problem is a chaos warrior dedicated to khorne is better at fighting than a blood warrior who's entirely dedicated to khorne. Points aside that doesn't make sense.

I personally feel like a well disciplined Knight dedicated to a God of Murder riding under the banner of the Everchosen outclassing a maddened berserker makes sense to me. 🤷‍♂️

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Neverchosen said:

I personally feel like a well disciplined Knight dedicated to a God of Murder riding under the banner of the Everchosen outclassing a maddened berserker makes sense to me. 🤷‍♂️

Except they’re both maddened berserkers- One has a lot more blessing directly and it’s not the one in Chaos Undecided. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Magnus The Blue said:

No universal prayer or spell lores!

6 minutes ago, Arzalyn said:

Also no universal artifacts or traits!

Is this from the Honest Wargamer stream?

Damn, that's sad news. Not saying that I used the universal command traits or universal artifacts a lot, but I certainly liked mystic shield/arcane bolt.

Not much choice if there is only 1 spell lore with 3 spells, 3 heroic traits, 3 artefacts of power.

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tonhel said:

Is this from the Honest Wargamer stream?

Damn, that's sad news. Not saying that I used the universal command traits or universal artifacts a lot, but I certainly liked mystic shield/arcane bolt.

Not much choice if there is only 1 spell lore with 3 spells, 3 heroic traits, 3 artefacts of power.

It is, there are some pdf circling around with the pages from the stream.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Neverchosen said:

I personally feel like a well disciplined Knight dedicated to a God of Murder riding under the banner of the Everchosen outclassing a maddened berserker makes sense to me. 🤷‍♂️

That would be the bloodreavers which judging from the blood warrior will be inexplicably worse at fighting than a marauder.

 

Blood warriors are warriors (presumably chaos warriors) who fought so good Khorne blesses them and claims them as his own. If the blessing of khorne is -1 to hit with your melee attacks he's a pretty poor God of war don't you think? 

 

Like yes they are more berserk than a chaos warrior but that doesn't seem to come with any benefit except dying? It's just a flavor failure.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Neverchosen said:

I personally feel like a well disciplined Knight dedicated to a God of Murder riding under the banner of the Everchosen outclassing a maddened berserker makes sense to me. 🤷‍♂️

9 minutes ago, ScionOfOssia said:

Except they’re both maddened berserkers- One has a lot more blessing directly and it’s not the one in Chaos Undecided. 

I would say they lose a bit of their discipline with the pledge to Khorne :D

"Khorne is the most violent and destructive of the four major Chaos Gods. He represents unrestrained aggression, mindless frenzy, and bloodshed on the battlefield."

There is really no reason why a blood warrior who is basically a chaos warrior with the mark of Khorne should have a lower to hit attribute than a StD Chaos warrior with the Mark of Khorne. They are basically the same with the small difference that Blood Warriors went all the way compared to the chaos warriors.

Edited by Tonhel
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tonhel said:

I would say they lose a bit of their discipline with the pledge to Khorne :D

"Khorne is the most violent and destructive of the four major Chaos Gods. He represents unrestrained aggression, mindless frenzy, and bloodshed on the battlefield."

There is really no reason why a blood warrior who is basically a chaos warrior with the mark of Khorne should have a lower to hit attribute than a StD Chaos warrior with the Mark of Khorne. They are basically the same with the small difference that Blood Warriors went all the way compared to the chaos warriors.

I'll add that Skullfrays show that isn't a requirement. Khorne is also the God of Martial might and discipline. 

Skullfray beastmen march in ranks and columns like a real military thanks to the influence of Khorne though they do still devolve into brutal violence once the blood starts flowing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reality is that with the addition of buffs and blood tithe points the Blood Warriors will eventually outclass a Chaos Warrior in combat. I just personally think that it makes sense that they loose a little of their discipline in reaching that frenzy but as blood starts to flow they will outclass a chaos warrior. But I also didn't write the rules I just think that I can see the logic behind it personally. 

Personally I would have given them a 4+, 3+ and then further increased the profile with an additional rend to show the brutality of aligning with Khorne. But again I didn't write the rules. 

Edited by Neverchosen
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the intent is to limit save stacking Mystic Shield had to go, or be changed substantially, it's been a bit of a bugbear of mine throughout 3rd that the best spell in the game is the default option everybody learns in wizard school.

Now, if they can't write 3 actually compelling/useful spell options for every lore than I may change my words, but on its face I don't think killing the generic lore is a bad move.  Even if just from a narrative perspective, with different armies having fundamentally different magics.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lucentia said:

If the intent is to limit save stacking Mystic Shield had to go, or be changed substantially, it's been a bit of a bugbear of mine throughout 3rd that the best spell in the game is the default option everybody learns in wizard school.

Now, if they can't write 3 actually compelling/useful spell options for every lore than I may change my words, but on its face I don't think killing the generic lore is a bad move.  Even if just from a narrative perspective, with different armies having fundamentally different magics.

It’s not even like Arcane Bolt wasn’t already outclassed in pretty much every faction besides the Idoneth (Who made up the difference with just having a few other legitimately good spells). Generic spells was basically just Lore of Mystic Shield. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, JackStreicher said:

Erm, I thought summoning was gone?

Bloodthirster recursion sounds a hell lot like summoning tbh. It’s basically a Durthu with wings recursion xD

Blades of Khorne look powerful

Literally several factions have gotten a recursion ability for even cheaper.

 

heck - dead Alarielle can bring HERSELF back 

8 BT is a hefty cost and they have to have died in the first place so no, this is not summoning

Edited by Cdance93
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ScionOfOssia said:

It’s not even like Arcane Bolt wasn’t already outclassed in pretty much every faction besides the Idoneth (Who made up the difference with just having a few other legitimately good spells). Generic spells was basically just Lore of Mystic Shield. 

You’re not wrong. The only time I ever cast arcane bolt was when I ran out of valid targets for my other more useful spells, or really needed that one specific guaranteed mortal wound for a battle tactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • I'm glad Blood Tithe still exists--most fun battle trait in the game.
  • I'm sad Hatred of Sorcery is gone--my favorite battle trait in the game.
  • Bloodthirsters getting non-random big damage is awesome. 5+ ward with the other greater daemons, also awesome.
  • Bloodletters still cool.
  • Surprised and happy to see a mixed mortal/daemon subfaction. We need more of those in AoS.
  • Karanak still sucks and will probably always suck. They don't know what to do with that doggo.
  • Blood Warriors being worse in combat than Chaos Warriors is ridiculous nonsense.

Finally, onward to the Core Rules release and full Indexes!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloodwarriors aren't chaos warriors marked by Khorne. They are bloodreavers ascending to bloodwarriors and are expressly stated to be beserkers. Conceptually they fit "marked chaos warriors" in the same way blightkings do, but they are very different things lorewise. 

 

Their product description: 

Spoiler

Creatures whose rage has taken them over completely, who know nothing but the appropriate red mist of anger, whose fury is such that it literally radiates off them in visible waves of livid heat, the Blood Warriors of Khorne are a mass of intense aggression and sheer bloodlust. Even striking one down offers no respite, as even the most traumatically wounded of these terrifying warriors will fight on in a trancelike frenzy

.

They are absolutely  less disciplined vs even the marked warriors of Archaon's legions who are much closer to the old school conception of a marked warrior. Swinging wild but with all the buffs doing better is where they should be. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Colonic said:

Bloodwarriors aren't chaos warriors marked by Khorne. They are bloodreavers ascending to bloodwarriors and are expressly stated to be beserkers. Conceptually they fit "marked chaos warriors" in the same way blightkings do, but they are very different things lorewise. 

 

Their product description: 

  Reveal hidden contents

Creatures whose rage has taken them over completely, who know nothing but the appropriate red mist of anger, whose fury is such that it literally radiates off them in visible waves of livid heat, the Blood Warriors of Khorne are a mass of intense aggression and sheer bloodlust. Even striking one down offers no respite, as even the most traumatically wounded of these terrifying warriors will fight on in a trancelike frenzy

.

They are absolutely  less disciplined vs even the marked warriors of Archaon's legions who are much closer to the old school conception of a marked warrior. Swinging wild but with all the buffs doing better is where they should be. 

Imagine if Slaanesh marked chaos warriors were faster than Painbringers nurlge marked tougher than blightkings (aren't they?) And tzeentch marked better than... oh sorry Mitgas.

 

 

 

It's just dumb for chaos warriors (sorry warriors who are dedicated to the ruinous powers of chaos) blessed by a God to be worse at that gods speciality than chaos warriors dedicated to a God.

Edited by The Red King
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Colonic said:

Bloodwarriors aren't chaos warriors marked by Khorne. They are bloodreavers ascending to bloodwarriors and are expressly stated to be beserkers. Conceptually they fit "marked chaos warriors" in the same way blightkings do, but they are very different things lorewise. 

 

Their product description: 

  Hide contents

Creatures whose rage has taken them over completely, who know nothing but the appropriate red mist of anger, whose fury is such that it literally radiates off them in visible waves of livid heat, the Blood Warriors of Khorne are a mass of intense aggression and sheer bloodlust. Even striking one down offers no respite, as even the most traumatically wounded of these terrifying warriors will fight on in a trancelike frenzy

.

They are absolutely  less disciplined vs even the marked warriors of Archaon's legions who are much closer to the old school conception of a marked warrior. Swinging wild but with all the buffs doing better is where they should be. 

Valid points, but in what way does this mean that their to hit value should be worse than a chaos warrior? Suddently discipline is reflected in the To hit value? Martial combat skill is imo atleast of the same value and should be reflect in the To hit value.

Now the Blood warrior is a lesser fighter compared to a chaos warrior with the mark of Khorne and has the exact same combat prowness of a squig. Imo, a 3+/3+ would have been more flavourful.

10 minutes ago, The Red King said:

Imagine if Slaanesh marked chaos warriors were faster than Painbringers nurlge marked tougher than blightkings (aren't they?) And tzeentch marked better than... oh sorry Mitgas.

 

 

 

It's just dumb for chaos warriors (sorry warriors who are dedicated to the ruinous powers of chaos) blessed by a God to be worse at that gods speciality than chaos warriors dedicated to a God.

Exactly.

Edited by Tonhel
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Double Misfire said:

They all started wearing armour and became Ironjawz/They all found religion and became the marked beastmen in the Tzeentch and Slaanesh lists?

They all entered into a Realmgate to never be seen again.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, The Red King said:

Imagine if Slaanesh marked chaos warriors were faster than Painbringers nurlge marked tougher than blightkings (aren't they?) And tzeentch marked better than... oh sorry Mitgas.

image.gif.3a825d3c5f135a0e280c2ed2a736d002.gif
 

My time will come! 😤

 

❤️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...